On January 6, supporters of former President Trump built an ersatz gallows and chanted about executing any number of political leaders. The woman who was killed when she tried to break into the Speaker’s Lobby was lionized as a martyr and the man who did his job by protecting members of Congress was branded a murderer. Trump gave tacit approval to the riot by waiting hours to speak, validating their actions with his first words.
In returning to the political limelight after announcing his candidacy for the 2024 election, Trump said he is his supporters’ retribution. That statement includes a promise that he’ll get even for whatever offenses have been weathered by his base. It’s not a threat to tickle his opponents into submission.
In the 2022 elections, the Republican Senatorial candidate Eric Greitens campaign introduced supposed RINO (Republican in Name Only) Hunting permits in a commercial that showed him storming a house while heavily armed. When Trump was asked who he supported in Missouri, Greitens or Eric Schmidt, he said he endorsed Eric. It’s no surprise that he said nothing about Greitens’ ad. For his part, Greitens laughed the ad off as a joke.
So it wasn’t surprising when Right Side Broadcast Network (RSBN) reporter Matthew Alvarez asked a Trump support at his Erie, Pennsylvania rally what to do about “the left and RINOs, the globalists” and the Trump support said, “Kill ’em all! Kill ’em all!”
If that’s where the story ended, I wouldn’t bother with it. Every political movement has its fringe.
The problem came when Alvarez responded, “I agree with you on that.” That’s not fringe; it’s a reporter for an outlet within the conservative media ecosystem condoning the political execution of tens of millions of American citizens.
When he mentioned the incident later, Alvarez said, “That is not something that I agree with, obviously. So, if there is something that happened, where somebody was speaking out there, I didn’t hear those words spoken. It’s very loud outside, all I know is I’m here for God, for this country, for truth, for President Trump, that kind of thing. Definitely not a proponent for anything like that happening.”
It didn’t seem that loud in the video. The words, and Alvarez’s agreement, were very clear.
Alvarez’s colleague Brian Glenn blamed anyone who would take offense, saying, “This is what many on the left will do, they’ll take a clip of that and they will run with it and, all of a sudden, the statement that is that you want to ‘kill everybody’ or whatever. We all know that’s not what you meant to get across.”
That’s standard operating procedure in what passes for the conservative movement: say something inflammatory, then act turn yourself into a victim and blame the people who respond.
Against the backdrop of Greitens and January 6, or Trump saying he’s his supporters’ retribution…against the backdrop of threats against election workers and librarians, this is more than an innocent mistake. At best, it’s careless and irresponsible. At worst, it’s the continuation of a red thread of violence and intimidation against any who would dare stand against Trump and the MAGA movement, should they return to power.
As screwed up as Biden and the Democrats are, they aren’t calling for death to their enemies. Although Anderson Cooper often drips arrogance and condescension, he’s never agreed with someone calling mass executions of American citizens. Though Joy Behar would probably dismiss anyone to the right of Biden as a waste of humanity, she’s never called for their death.
Despite the dismissals and false equivalences, the same theme seems consistent in conservative rhetoric: the war we’re entering won’t be figurative. The other side must die.
The most violent are telling us who they are. We need to believe them.