It’s entirely possible Tony Romo was about to drop a racial slur during Sunday’s AFC championship game. Shannon Sharpe certainly thinks so.
Sharpe is the NFL Hall of Fame tight end, primarily with the Denver Broncos. He’s also the guy who got into a shouting match with several members of the NBA’s Memphis Grizzlies last week–an act that probably would’ve gotten almost anyone else removed from the arena.
Sharpe’s not alone in his assessment. If you listen to the clip, it’s entirely possible Tony Romo was about to say the n-word. In fairness, he seemed to have said the word before.
Romo was once the golden child of NFL analysts. He seemed to read the future with his predictions of what would come next. His fortunes–and performance–have slid this year.
None of that would’ve been relevant if Romo were to actually use the slur Sunday. He didn’t. He said a single syllable that may or may not have been the beginning of that word. Only he knows for sure.
That hasn’t stopped a small, but vocal minority from calling for his removal.
That probably won’t happen. CBS doesn’t have the Super Bowl this year, meaning Romo’s called his last game for the year. By next football season someone’s sure to have done something to take Romo’s place.
It begs the question, however, if that’s enough to fire someone. On a related note, highly rated quarterback recruit Marcus Stokes lost his scholarship to the University of Florida after a Tik Tok video emerged of him rapping song lyrics that included the N-word. Albany State University in Georgia extended, then revoked, its scholarship offer to Stokes, who’s still looking for a college. (Albany State is a historically black college.)
This isn’t a free speech issue. Romo is employed by CBS and is subject to whatever they decide to do, within the limitations of his contract. No college is required to extend any type of offer to Marcus Stokes. Nor should they be.
If you find yourself thinking Stokes is a victim, what would you think if he, say, urinated on a Bible?
The question is whether redemption is possible for some things. Is it enough that Romo was maybe starting to say that word? Does the hurt extended to the black community go away because he didn’t actually follow through?
Should anyone give Marcus Stokes a chance?
Are there degrees of severity? Is his offense, singing a song that includes the word, the same as, say, attending a white supremacist meeting?
They’re thorny questions that result in knee-jerk responses, depending your viewpoint. Zero tolerance seems to be the guiding principle, one way or the other.
The black community is still reeling from yet another police-involved murder of what appeared to be an innocent man. In their position, I’m not sure I’d be eager to extend the benefit of the doubt.
But there has to be a line. There has to be context.
Mark Twain was no racist. Neither was Mel Brooks. But some people are. Do we believe in redemption for them? Can we hold out the possibility of change?
I don’t know Tony Romo or Marcus Stokes. Maybe they’re both racist assholes. Stokes has apologized. Maybe he means it, and maybe he’s doing what’s required to find a place to land. Romo, at least to this point, has said nothing.
Meanwhile, we’re still trying to figure out how to navigate these waters.