Free speech is the answer to free speech.
I’d love to lay claim to those words, but they come from a guy I listen to on the radio. They apply in Alabama and around the country these days, as conservatives try to preserve what they think this country is about by banishing one of its core values: freedom of expression.
In Alabama, Governor Kay Ivey has replaced her director of early childhood education, a woman named Barbara Cooper. Cooper oversaw the distribution of a book called the National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC) Developmentally Appropriate Practice Book, 4th edition. (The title alone makes me want to nap.)
The governor’s media release cited two issues with the book. In the first, the book says, “the United States is built on systemic and structural racism.” The second issue is about discussing LGBTQ+ inclusion to four year olds.
There’s plenty to discuss about the first issue. Slavery was part of the economic engine of this country for its first 100 years. And though we’ve made strides, incidents like Bruce’s Beach in Los Angeles and the Tulsa Race Massacre (something I never learned about in school) are part of our history. I don’t happen to believe the US is built on racism, but that’s a debate to be had, not a viewpoint to be eliminated.
As for the second issue, children are curious. It’s within the realm of possibility that a four-year-old might ask why he or she has a mommy and a daddy, but Heather has two mommies. God forbid we spend time trying to think of an answer that’s not from Leviticus 18. No one’s suggesting that we tell kindergarteners how lesbians have sex (if they were, I’d be against that). Discussions about how to address that question seem appropriate for teachers.
Ivey says the Cooper’s firing shows that Alabama won’t tolerate woke concepts. She’s made it clear what happens to anyone who dares disagree.
A generation ago, conservatives were pushed for inclusion in increasingly hostile college campuses. They said they wanted a level playing field against an increasingly intolerant intellectual leadership class. They wanted diversity of viewpoint alongside demographic diversity.
They were right in their goals.
Now, they’re just replacing one set of restrictive viewpoints and penalties for denying orthodoxy with another.
Ironically, in defending the United States, they’re eliminating its most important core principle.