The CNN opinion piece about the Sports Illustrated swimsuit edition would’ve normally been right up my alley for a wholesome rant. Frankie de la Cretaz, the author of the piece, criticizes the yearly issue for “glamming up” the WBNA players who appear in the issue, especially the ones who are out and queer. One was “typically femme-leaning, but unfussy” and another who “favors more of a soft butch aesthetic.” Neither appeared that way in the issue. To de la Cretaz, that was a bad thing.
de la Cretaz says “the framing buys into century-old anxieties around women’s gender roles and presentation, but it’s a bizarre misstep for a league that has grown, since its inception, in terms of letting their players embrace a more diverse range of gender expressions.”
My initial thought was that they (de la Cretaz) were criticizing the league and the players for embracing gender expressions in the wrong way. When the players are non-conformist in their presentations, they must be conform to the proper methods of being non-conformist. Or something.
If you can use such a word in this context, de la Cretaz’s criticism seems a little paternalistic.
While the progressive movement has resulted in some positive changes, this is the type of scolding that makes me wince. (In fairness, the right does it, too, usually in the name of God and patriotism and whatever has them annoyed at the moment.)
That was my first set of thoughts, and I consider them largely valid.
As I thought more, my opinion evolved. Given de la Cretaz’s use of the plural pronoun in reference to themself on their website, and the large earrings that say queer in one of her publicity shots, I’m assuming they self-identify as queer. The players they reference are also queer.
I’m a straight white Christian dude who is guilty of all the privileges, including some I probably haven’t thought of.
In other words, this isn’t my battle. I have an opinion (you just read it) but ultimately, this isn’t my area. My opinion about this issue, awesome though it may be, is largely immaterial.
If de la Cretaz were to chastise me for how I appear as a straight white dude, one of my first thoughts would be “What’s it to you? Stay in your lane!” It being a free country, they’re entitled to their opinion, but their opinion is largely immaterial.
Like mine in this case.
I’m as straight as can be. Have been since I felt something I couldn’t explain the first time I saw Yeoman Rand on Star Trek. My views on non-straight culture and how people represent it don’t count for a lot. Nor should they.
So there’s my opinion on this topic. Feel free to ignore it, as millions of people in the US alone have done on a daily basis since this blog was published.